Thread: Russian tankers supplied fuel to north korea

pops42 - 1/2/2018 at 08:13 PM


Sources: Russian tankers gave North Korea fuel
by Bob D’Angelo, Cox Media Group National Content Desk, NCD
2:20 am December 30, 2017
Russian tankers have supplied fuel to North Korea on at least three occasions in recent months by transferring cargoes at sea, Reuters reported Saturday.
Reuters, quoting two "senior Western European security sources," said the transfers are providing an economic lifeline to North Korea. The sale of oil or oil products from Russia are in violation of U.N. sanctions, the sources told Reuters.
The transfers took place in October and November, Reuters reported.
"Russian vessels have made ship-to-ship transfers of petrochemicals to North Korean vessels on several occasions this year in breach of sanctions," the first security source, who spoke on condition of anonymity, told Reuters.
A second source independently confirmed the existence of the Russian ship-to-ship fuel trade with North Korea. This source said there was no evidence of Russian state involvement in the latest transfers.
"There is no evidence that this is backed by the Russian state but these Russian vessels are giving a lifeline to the North Koreans," the second European security source said.


nebish - 1/2/2018 at 11:59 PM

Time for a UN blockage?


2112 - 1/3/2018 at 11:40 PM

quote:
Time for a UN blockage?


Nah, no need. Our president will put a stop to this using his Twitter account.


OriginalGoober - 1/4/2018 at 12:28 AM



And Hillary had no moral or ethical concerns doing a Uranium deal with them


2112 - 1/4/2018 at 01:33 AM

quote:


And Hillary had no moral or ethical concerns doing a Uranium deal with them


Hillary did a uranium deal with North Korea? When did that happen?

[Edited on 1/4/2018 by 2112]


jkeller - 1/4/2018 at 02:40 AM

quote:


And Hillary had no moral or ethical concerns doing a Uranium deal with them


First, the uranium story has been debunked. Second, let me explain this to you.

HILLARY CLINTON HOLDS NO PUBLIC OFFICE

Tough guy Trump is tasked with enforcing theban along with the UN.


2112 - 1/4/2018 at 02:48 AM

Hillary is all they got. The only possible way to defend Trump is to somehow discredit his opponent that is no longer relevant. Isn't that what the Democrats did by bringing up McCain and Romney when right wingers insulted Obama. Oh wait, never mind.


MartinD28 - 1/4/2018 at 05:11 PM

quote:


And Hillary had no moral or ethical concerns doing a Uranium deal with them


Why didn't you suggest that the House Of Reps. investigate HC and Benghazi? That would be something new.


Sang - 1/4/2018 at 08:26 PM

quote:
quote:


And Hillary had no moral or ethical concerns doing a Uranium deal with them


Hillary did a uranium deal with North Korea? When did that happen?

[Edited on 1/4/2018 by 2112]



More right wing trash. Hillary had nothing to do with the deal - there is plenty of reading material out there on what really happened and who actually did the approvals. But Goob can't bother to look at the facts. Plus, the Russians own the uranium, but can only sell it in the US or Canada unless they get approval to sell elsewhere.........

https://www.factcheck.org/2017/10/facts-uranium-one/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2017/10/27/claims-of-clinton-russia -uranium-scandal-are-a-real-empty-barrel/#1a87d3127b55

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/14/hillary-clinton-uranium-one-deal- russia-explainer-244895


2112 - 1/4/2018 at 10:31 PM

quote:
quote:
quote:


And Hillary had no moral or ethical concerns doing a Uranium deal with them


Hillary did a uranium deal with North Korea? When did that happen?

[Edited on 1/4/2018 by 2112]



More right wing trash. Hillary had nothing to do with the deal - there is plenty of reading material out there on what really happened and who actually did the approvals. But Goob can't bother to look at the facts. Plus, the Russians own the uranium, but can only sell it in the US or Canada unless they get approval to sell elsewhere.........

https://www.factcheck.org/2017/10/facts-uranium-one/

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2017/10/27/claims-of-clinton-russia -uranium-scandal-are-a-real-empty-barrel/#1a87d3127b55

https://www.politico.com/story/2017/11/14/hillary-clinton-uranium-one-deal- russia-explainer-244895


When it comes to Hillary, all facts and reason goes out the window. Why do you think the Republicans spent millions of dollars on Benghazi investigation after Benghazi investigation, even when the previous one conducted by fellow Republicans found no wrong doing. It's a weird obsession. I don't get it, but somehow it is a rallying point for Trump supporters and in their mind somehow an excuse for Trump's poor job performance.


gina - 1/5/2018 at 09:52 PM

quote:
quote:


And Hillary had no moral or ethical concerns doing a Uranium deal with them


First, the uranium story has been debunked. Second, let me explain this to you.

HILLARY CLINTON HOLDS NO PUBLIC OFFICE

Tough guy Trump is tasked with enforcing the ban along with the UN.


But was she the Secretary of State when the Uranium deal was going on? IF so, since she reported to someone else (her boss), then more people would be involved.

Personally, I think we should just sanction whatever countries we want to as our own sovereign nation, and WE should stop doing trade deals, sending foreign aid etc. and let the other countries make their own decisions as to doing what they feel is in their own best interests. That'[s what China does, and they do not get into wars, and nobody threatens to nuke them. We could try that couldn't we?


This thread come from : Hittin' The Web with the Allman Brothers Band
http://hittintheweb.com/

Url of this website:
http://hittintheweb.com//modules.php?op=modload&name=XForum&file=viewthread&fid=127&tid=145832